Venice by Giacomo Brunelli (June 2022)

Giacomo Brunelli's latest offering sees him turning his eye and camera to Venice. He says that "Venice is a project I decided to start in response to the fragility of the city after the exceptional November 2019 'Acqua Alta' …" It is his first self-published book and in his unique style, Giacomo gives us an expressionistic and atmospheric interpretation of Venice.

For those not familiar with Giacomo’s work, it can be loosely summed up as film noir street photography. However, he has published books on subjects as diverse as animals (The Animals, his first book) and Self Portraits (published 2017). He has also published New York, Eternal London, and Hamburg.

I first came across Giacomo's work through his book Eternal London (2016), which followed an exhibition at The Photographers' Gallery in 2014. I remember being struck by his style and it left a strong impression on me.

Eternal London Exhibition at The Photographers' Gallery 2014

---

I made a modest contribution to Venice: I was fortunate to work with Giacomo in the very early stages of Venice, mocking up ideas for the cover, and then helping with the digital book layout.

The first 250 copies of Venice are numbered and signed. There are also two limited special editions of with prints (these are not in the book). Venice and other books are available from his website here . Venice is also available at The Photographers' Gallery bookshop here.

I have also made a photobook flip-through of Venice. You can view it on YouTube here.

JCH Street Pan 400 Black and White Film: The Near-Infrared Experience

BLOG RSS

Searching For An ISO 400 B&W Film

Towards the end of March, as we entered longer days, I started looking for a 35mm ISO 400 B&W film to use during British Summer Time (March to October). My go-to film during the dark winter months had been Kodak TMAX P3200 but with longer and brighter days, I wanted to use an ISO 400 film.

For some time now, I have found myself drawn to black and white infrared (IR) images but the downside of IR photography, for me, is the slow shutter speed that necessitates tripod use while I like to do hand-held shooting. True IR films also needed to be loaded into and unloaded from the camera in darkness: not practical with the Leica’s film loading system.

A black and white infrared (IR) image looks like this:

Black and white infrared image. This is not mine and I don’t own the copyright to this image.

The infrared in the leaves and grass shows up white through an IR filter and the clear parts of the sky turn dark.

The reason why IR photography uses slow shutter speeds is because you have to use an IR filter to cut out nearly all the visible light (that means near complete darkness) and only lets in the infrared light, which is not in the visible part of the spectrum (see below).

The Infrared part of the spectrum is between 700 - 1000 nm.

Relax. You can open your eyes now. The physics lesson is over.

Given the hurdles in IR photography for me, I was intrigued when I heard about JCH Street Pan.

JCH Street Pan ISO 400 Black and White Film

Before I go on, I’d like to say up front that this is not a film review. I am not interested in comparing its properties with other films and what one might or might not do with it. I am merely sharing my experience with it.

JCH = Japan Camera Hunter aka Bellamy Hunt. He lives in Japan and sources rare, high quality film cameras for customers around the world. He has now branched out to produce his own film, the JCH Street Pan.

I did some brief research on the web (not much) and I read on a few forums that it’s a discontinued surveillance film. Some people have no problem developing it and getting good results while some have. It seems to me that people either loved it or loathed it with not much in the middle.

The most intriguing thing for me about the film is that, according to its product description: “when paired with a dark red filter, you’ll find that this high contrast black and white film can also act as an infrared film  — with high sensitivity in the IR range.”

Here was a regular black and white film (it doesn’t have to be loaded and unloaded in darkness) that is medium fast (that means it can be shot hand-held, especially if I can push it +2 stops).

The only thing that gave me pause was the price tag: at £11 a roll, it was not a budget price tag. That’s only a shade over the Kodak TMAX P3200. However, I decided I wanted to try out the near-IR effects and so I bought four rolls.

I also needed a dark red filter and after some research, I went for a Tiffen Dark Red #29 filter.

I had intended to push JCH Streetpan two stops to ISO 1600, which would allow me to comfortably hand-hold my camera but the only development time I found for a +2 stop development was with the Kodak HC110 developer but because of Covid-19 supply chain disruptions, it was nowhere to be had in the UK.

There was nothing for it but to shoot the film at box speed (where there was a range of developers available) and hope that a 3-4 stop drop would not cause too much camera shake. But then again, blur in an image is not an issue for me.

Messed Up The Development

After shooting a couple of rolls, it was time to develop them. Here I came across a snag: the dilution for Ilfosol 3 as given inside the film box as 1+3 with a development time of 5 minutes. This is not the standard dilutions for Ilfosol 3, which are 1+9 or 1+14. For those who don’t develop film, that means 1 part developer to x part water. A 1+3 dilution means it’s 3x stronger than a 1+9. Plus, it’s a non-standard dilution. Was it a typo?

I was impatient to see the results, so I decided to go with my normal 1+9 dilution but compensate for the weaker dilution with more development time (6.5 mins vs 5 mins). The result was that it was very much under-developed! Negatives were grey and there was not much tone separation. I couldn’t even see the frame numbers! However, there were still enough details on many frames to be useable, like this one below:

Developed using Ilfosol 3, 1+9 dilution, 6m 30s, 20 deg C - would not recommend this dilution and time! The film was under-developed.

After that not very successful attempt, I decided I’d give the recommended dilution (1+3) a try. This one came out better but also seemed slightly under-developed. I was rapidly losing my enthusiasm for JCH Street Pan.

Embrace The Flaws

However, even if there are imperfections, there is always something useable. The imperfections themselves could be used to advantage.

In these under-developed rolls were some of my favourite pigeon images ever. Because the IR filter forced me to use a slow shutter speed, it produced movement blur which really added a certain subtle dynamism to the images, like the rustling of leaves in a gentle breeze.

One of my favourite pigeon images of all time. Shot with JCH Street Pan.

The Iconic Dog Image

Moriyama has his stray, Koudelka his black and now I have mine.

Mine is not iconic yet, of course, but give it time!

The Near-IR Effect

For rolls 3 and 4, I thought I’d really test the film’s near-IR effect and so I shot a lot of leaves and trees, and also skies (to see if they do turn very dark). I ordered some Ilford ID-11, a popular, well-established powder developer which has essentially the same formula as Kodak D76. I got much better result with ID-11 using the dilution and timing given on the inside of the film box. The negs were properly developed and tones separation was good.

Below are some images from rolls 3 and 4:

Where Next With JCH Street Pan?

This film gave me a few of my all-time favourite images and for that, I am grateful that I gave it a go. However, there were too many inconsistent negs where parts of the similar light values would suddenly be lighter or darker than the surrounding parts. Together with the high price tag, I don’t find many compelling reasons to use it on a day to day basis. That is not to say I won’t use it again in future. I might well do when I want that certain look and feel.

For now, the search for an ISO 400 B&W film continues …

---

Links

I got my JCH Street Pan from Analogue Wonderland here.

Japan Camera Hunter website

Tiffen Dark Red R29 Filter: Amazon UK, Amazon US, Tiffen US

Note: I don’t get any commission or receive any financial rewards when you use these links.

Cinestill 800T - A Black and White Shooter's Impression

When I first got (back) into film at the start of 2019, quite a few people told me about Cinestill 800T. Up to the point I went into film, my work had been in colour, so it was no surprise to have people recommending colour film to me. After a few months of shooting black and white, I bought two rolls of Cinestill 800T in mid-2019,  since which time they have sat on the shelf and quietly expired along the way.

But last month, feeling a hankering to foray into colour film, I decided to shoot the two rolls of (now expired) Cinestill 800T before the days got longer and I had to go out at a late hour to shoot them at night.

This is not a film review of Cinestill 800T. It is my impressions as someone who shoots exclusively black and white film. Bear that in mind as you read this.

Impressions and experience

Having shot in black and white exclusively for around two years, I found shooting for colour slightly disorientating. With colour, one is looking for a different composition, where colour is one of the elements. It could be the subject but if it is not, then it shouldn't overwhelm the subject, competing for attention. So, I think there is more to consider when shooting in colour than in black and white. 

Secondly, I couldn't really pre-visualise the end result as I wasn't familiar with the colour properties of this film. I had a rough idea from what I had seen of other people’s images but that was my only reference point. 

Lastly, I was limited to the locations I could shoot: due to covid restrictions, I restricted myself to my locality. It might be, with more interesting locations, I could do the images more justice. 

Light Leaks

My favourite images from the two rolls are the ones with the "light leak" streaks. I don't think they are light leaks as such but something to do with the film or its having expired. But that red/orangy-red is very striking.

Here they are, together with the obligatory Shell petrol station shot but it’s better with the light leak effect, don't you think?

Halation On Lights

One of the attraction of Cinestill 800T is the halation around lights. I think this has pros and cons. Obviously when there are many lights present you can compose for that effect. At the same time, if there are many lights present but you don't want them to stand out, there is not much you can do.

In this image below, I am composing for the light halations.

But in this image below, I could do without the light halation. It makes the light the central point (which I didn’t want) but you can argue it works in a way. But I was disappointed with the overall colour because it doesn’t capture the mood of the actual scene.

Greenish Hue

I got a distinct greenish hue in many images. I have noticed this in other people's images shot on this film. From what I have read though, Cinestill 800T is tungsten balanced and should produce fairly good white-balanced results when shot under urban lights at night. I'm not sure why I got this greenish hue (sometimes together with magenta): it may be the light source, or that the film has expired, or the development (it was processed by a lab). I am neutral on the greenish hue: it could be used to good effect but it's something to bear in mind when composing for it.

In Summary

To use this film to good effect, I'd have to experiment a lot more. Initially, only the light leaks images made an impact and I didn’t warm to the others for a while but some are beginning to grow on me. Personally, I find the colour rendition (fairly muted at times) coupled with the greenish hue a challenge to compose for. And much as I like the acidental light leak effect, I can’t call them up at will. If we then factor in the cost of a roll at £12-£13 per roll of 36 35mm film, the cons far outweigh the pros for me to experiment. So for now, it’s back to black and white for me.